Bibliography

Bibliography#

[BT06]

Wolfganf Baumjohann and Rudolf A. Treumann. Basic space plasma physics. Imperial College Press, reprinted edition, 2006. ISBN 978-1-86094-079-8.

[CC18]

Michael R. Collier and Hyunju K. Connor. Magnetopause surface reconstruction from tangent vector observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2018. URL: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2018JA025763 (visited on 2025-06-11), doi:10.1029/2018JA025763.

[Cra97]

T. E. Cravens. Comet hyakutake x-ray source: charge transfer of solar wind heavy ions. Geophysical Research Letters, 24(1):105–108, 1997. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL03780.

[Hou62]

P V.C. Hough. Method and means for recognizing complex patterns. 12 1962. US Patent 3,069,654. URL: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4746348.

[JSW+19]

Anders M. Jorgensen, Tianran Sun, Chi Wang, Lei Dai, Steven Sembay, Fei Wei, Yihong Guo, and Ronglan Xu. Boundary detection in three dimensions with application to the SMILE mission: the effect of photon noise. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 124(6):4365–4383, 2019. URL: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2018JA025919 (visited on 2025-06-11), doi:10.1029/2018JA025919.

[LZL+10]

R. L. Lin, X. X. Zhang, S. Q. Liu, Y. L. Wang, and J. C. Gong. A three-dimensional asymmetric magnetopause model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 115(A4):, 2010. URL: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2009JA014235, arXiv:https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2009JA014235, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014235.

[LDE+96]

C. M. Lisse, K. Dennerl, J. Englhauser, M. Harden, F. E. Marshall, M. J. Mumma, R. Petre, J. P. Pye, M. J. Ricketts, J. Schmitt, J. Trümper, and R. G. West. Discovery of x-ray and extreme ultraviolet emission from comet c/hyakutake 1996 b2. Science, 274(5285):205–209, 1996. URL: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.274.5285.205, arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.274.5285.205, doi:10.1126/science.274.5285.205.

[LLW+15]

Z.-Q. Liu, J. Y. Lu, C. Wang, K. Kabin, J. S. Zhao, M. Wang, J. P. Han, J. Y. Wang, and M. X. Zhao. A three-dimensional high mach number asymmetric magnetopause model from global mhd simulation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 120(7):5645–5666, 2015. URL: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2014JA020961, arXiv:https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2014JA020961, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020961.

[NAMDW+22a]

G. Nguyen, N. Aunai, B. Michotte De Welle, A. Jeandet, B. Lavraud, and D. Fontaine. Massive multi‐mission statistical study and analytical modeling of the earth's magnetopause: 1. a gradient boosting based automatic detection of near‐earth regions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2022. doi:10.1029/2021ja029773.

[NAMDW+22b]

G. Nguyen, N. Aunai, B. Michotte De Welle, A. Jeandet, B. Lavraud, and D. Fontaine. Massive multi‐mission statistical study and analytical modeling of the earth's magnetopause: 4. on the near‐cusp magnetopause indentation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2022. doi:10.1029/2021ja029776.

[Par58]

E. N. Parker. Dynamics of the interplanetary gas and magnetic fields. The Astrophysical Journal, 128:664, 1958. URL: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1086/146579 (visited on 2025-06-09), doi:10.1086/146579.

[Rea24]

Andrew Read. On the apparent line-of-sight alignment of the peak x-ray intensity of the magnetosheath and the tangent to the magnetopause, as viewed by SMILE-SXI. Earth and Planetary Physics, 8(1):155–172, 2024. doi:10.26464/epp2023062.

[RC03]

I. P. Robertson and T. E. Cravens. X-ray emission from the terrestrial magnetosheath. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(8):, 2003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016740.

[SSR+22]

Andrey Samsonov, Steven Sembay, Andrew Read, Jennifer Alyson Carter, Graziella Branduardi-Raymont, David Sibeck, and Philippe Escoubet. Finding magnetopause standoff distance using a soft x-ray imager: 2. methods to analyze 2-d x-ray images. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030850.

[SLAA+24]

S. Sembay, A. L. Alme, D. Agnolon, T. Arnold, A. Beardmore, A. Belén Balado Margeli, C. Bicknell, C. Bouldin, G. Branduardi-Raymont, T. Crawford, J. P. Breuer, T. Buggey, G. Butcher, R. Canchal, J. A. Carter, A. Cheney, Y. Collado-Vega, H. Connor, T. Crawford, N. Eaton, C. Feldman, C. Forsyth, T. Frantzen, G. Galgóczi, J. Garcia, G. Y. Genov, C. Gordillo, H-P. Gröbelbauer, M. Guedel, Y. Guo, M. Hailey, D. Hall, R. Hampson, J. Hasiba, O. Hetherington, A. Holland, S-Y. Hsieh, M. W. J. Hubbard, H. Jeszenszky, M. Jones, T. Kennedy, K. Koch-Mehrin, S. Kögl, S. Krucker, K. D. Kuntz, G. Laky, O. Lylund, A. Martindale, J. Miguel Mas Hesse, R. Nakamura, K. Oksavik, N. Østgaard, H. Ottacher, R. Ottensamer, C. Pagani, S. Parsons, P. Patel, J. Pearson, G. Peikert, F. S. Porter, T. Pouliantis, B. H. Qureshi, W. Raab, G. Randall, A. M. Read, N. M. M. Roque, M. E. Rostad, C. Runciman, S. Sachdev, A. Samsonov, M. Soman, D. Sibeck, S. Smit, J. Søndergaard, R. Speight, S. Stavland, M. Steller, TianRan Sun, J. Thornhill, W. Thomas, K. Ullaland, B. Walsh, D. Walton, C. Wang, S. Yang, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK, Space Park Leicester, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Dorking, RH5 6NT, UK, Centre for Electronic Imaging, Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6 AA, UK, Birkeland Centre for Space Science, Department of Physics and Technology, Univ. of Bergen, N-5007 Bergen, Norway, University of Vienna, A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, A-8042 Graz, Austria, National Institute of Aerospace Technology, Madrid, Spain, ESTEC, European Space Agency, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, Netherlands, State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Space Science Centre, Beijing 100190, China, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, CH-5210 Windisch, Switzerland, Koegl Space GmbH, CH-8157 Dielsdorf, Switzerland, Space Acoustics GmbH, CH-8157 Dielsdorf, Switzerland, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, 8400 Winterhur, Switzerland, Genov Solutions, N-5172 Loddefjord, Norway, STM Engineering, N-5165 Laksevag, Norway, John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, MD 20723, USA, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Centre, MD 20771, USA, Center for Space Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA, Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Masaryk University, 601 77 Brno, Czech Republic, Institute of Physics, E¨otvo¨s Lor´and University, 1053 Budapest, Hungary, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100045, China, and Centro de Astrobiologia (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Madrid, Spain. The soft x-ray imager (SXI) on the SMILE mission. Earth and Planetary Physics, 8(1):5–14, 2024. doi:10.26464/epp2023067.

[SCF+97]

J.-H. Shue, J. K. Chao, H. C. Fu, C. T. Russell, P. Song, K. K. Khurana, and H. J. Singer. A new functional form to study the solar wind control of the magnetopause size and shape. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 102(A5):9497–9511, 1997. URL: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/97JA00196, arXiv:https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/97JA00196, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA00196.

[SAA+18]

David Sibeck, Robert Allen, Homayon Aryan, D. Bodewits, P. Brandt, G. Branduardi-Raymont, G. Brown, Ju Carter, Y. Collado-Vega, Michael Collier, H. Connor, Thomas Cravens, Y. Ezoe, Mei-Ching Fok, Mauro Galeazzi, Olga Gutynska, M. Holmström, Syau-Yun Hsieh, K. Ishikawa, and S. Wing. Imaging plasma density structures in the soft x-rays generated by solar wind charge exchange with neutrals. Space Science Reviews, 214:, 06 2018. doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0504-7.

[SWC+20]

Tianran Sun, Chi Wang, Hyunju K. Connor, Anders M. Jorgensen, and Steven Sembay. Deriving the magnetopause position from the soft x-ray image by using the tangent fitting approach. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 125(9):e2020JA028169, 2020. doi:10.1029/2020JA028169.

[WCS+25]

S. J. Wharton, J. A. Carter, S. Sembay, Y. Soobiah, S. Nitti, and T. R. Sun. Modeling the magnetospheric 3d x-ray emission from SWCX using a cusp‐magnetosheath emissivity model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 130(2):e2024JA033307, 2025. URL: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033307 (visited on 2025-06-07), doi:10.1029/2024JA033307.

[XKM+24]

Qiuyu Xu, Dimitra Koutroumpa, Ronan Modolo, Tianran Sun, Hyunju Connor, Steve Sembay, and Yevhen Tkachenko. Modeling soft x‐ray emissions at the dayside magnetopause. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 129(8):e2024JA032687, 2024. URL: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA032687 (visited on 2025-06-11), doi:10.1029/2024JA032687.